docs: add user_images screenshots

Hi! I'm ready to help. I can see we're in the entire repo on branch feat/gemini-session-token-tracking.

What would you like to work on? For example:

• Implementing or debugging a feature
• Reviewing code or a PR
• Researching how something works in the codebase
• Auditing tests

Just let me know what you're after and I'll dig in.

Confirmed — there's only one worktree (/Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire) and it's on feat/gemini-session-token-tracking. No second worktree on another branch.

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• A git repo can have multiple worktrees, each checked out to a different branch from the same .git history. If your terminal were cd'd into one of those, it'd legitimately show a different branch than my session — but here there's only one, so that's ruled out.
• The session context I was given at startup is a one-time snapshot; it doesn't live-update. But here it matched reality anyway.
• Many shell prompts (starship, powerline, oh-my-zsh git plugin) cache the branch name and only re-render after the next command runs — so a terminal showing a stale branch usually just needs an Enter press. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

So: we are on the same branch. If your terminal is showing something different, the most likely cause is a stale prompt (hit Enter / run any command to refresh it) or you're looking at a different terminal tab.

What branch is your terminal showing? If it's genuinely different, I'd like to figure out why — but from every angle I can check, we're aligned on feat/gemini-session-token-tracking.

Mystery solved. Your terminal and my session are in two different git repositories that happen to be nested:

	My Claude Code session	Your terminal
Repo root	/Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire	/Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire/devenv/entireio/cli
Branch	feat/gemini-session-token-tracking	vscode-claude-hooks
Location	repo top-level	a worktree at .worktrees/vscode-hooks

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• The inner cli directory is its own independent repo (note its .git lives at devenv/entireio/cli/.git). To the outer repo it's just an untracked folder — that's why it showed up as ?? devenv/ in the outer repo's git status.
• That inner repo uses worktrees (the .worktrees/ convention), and your terminal is sitting in the vscode-hooks worktree on branch vscode-claude-hooks.
• This is why my git worktree list only showed one entry: worktree lists are per-repository, and I was querying the outer repo, which knows nothing about the inner repo's worktrees. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

So nothing's broken — they're just separate repos. The question is which one you want me working in.

I was launched with my working directory at the outer entire repo, but the work you're doing in the terminal (vscode-claude-hooks — looks hooks-related) is in the inner CLI repo.

Want me to switch over and work in /Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire/devenv/entireio/cli/.worktrees/vscode-hooks? If so, tell me what you're trying to do there and I'll dig in.

Done — I've switched over to the vscode-claude-hooks worktree.

Where I am now:

• Repo: /Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire/devenv/entireio/cli (the inner CLI repo)
• Worktree: .worktrees/vscode-hooks
• Branch: vscode-claude-hooks
• Working tree: clean except untracked docs/user_images/

entire status here shows this repo supports more agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Pi) and has several active Codex sessions — including one active ~28m ago ("there has been quite a few changes since the last time we...").

What this branch has changed vs main (small, focused diff):

• .codex/hooks.json — 8 lines
• .entire/settings.json — +16 lines
• cmd/entire/cli/integration_test/hooks.go — +24 lines

So this is hooks-configuration work (Codex/VSCode hooks + an integration test).

One caveat worth flagging: my Bash commands run from this worktree now, but my file tools (Read/Edit/Grep) use absolute paths regardless — so I'll point them at this worktree explicitly. The repo-context snapshot from session start still refers to the outer repo, so I'll ignore that and treat this worktree as ground truth.

What would you like to do here?

Done — the test commit is pushed.

What happened:

• Commit: d70438551 — test: verify entire visibility from vscode-claude-hooks worktree
• Pushed to: origin (entireio/cli) — created a new remote branch vscode-claude-hooks with upstream tracking set.

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• Notice the first line of the push output: [entire] Pushing entire/checkpoints/v1 to checkpoint remote.... That's an entire pre-push git hook firing — it syncs checkpoint data to the separate cli-checkpoints remote you saw earlier (entireio/cli-checkpoints). This is exactly the dual-remote setup that makes the work visible in entire: your code goes to origin, the checkpoint/session metadata goes to the checkpoints remote.
• Because this is a fresh remote branch, GitHub also offered a PR-create link — ignore that unless you actually want a PR. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

You should now see this commit show up in entire. Let me know if it appears as expected.

When you're done verifying, I can clean up — either delete the test-commit.md (commit the removal) or delete the remote branch entirely:

Want me to do either of those now, or leave it for you to confirm in entire first?

Here's the current status:

Git — clean and in sync:

• Local branch is even with origin/vscode-claude-hooks (nothing ahead/behind) — your test commit pushed cleanly.
• Only untracked item is docs/user_images/ (was there before; unrelated to the test).

entire — ● Enabled · manual-commit · branch vscode-claude-hooks, tracking 5 agent types.

Notable change since last check: the active Codex session ("there has been quite a few changes...") has aged out of the active list, and there are now many sessions showing — a mix of Claude Code and Codex, several marked stale (run 'entire doctor'):

Agent	Topic	Note
Codex (gpt-5.5)	"okay do that"	active 15h ago · 53.4M tokens
Codex (gpt-5.5)	"You are Codex continuing work..."	1.6M tokens
Codex (gpt-5.5)	"You are working in repo..."	stale
Claude Code (opus-4-8)	"i want to continue this session in codex..."	13d old · 382.8M tokens
Claude Code	"Say OK."	stale
Codex (gpt-5.4-mini) ×4	"agent review/quality experiment..."	all stale

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• Several sessions are flagged stale, which entire status itself tells you to fix with entire doctor. Stale usually means the session's process died or its heartbeat lapsed without a clean shutdown — entire doctor reconciles that tracking state. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

The test commit/push worked and git is fully in sync. Want me to run entire doctor to clear those stale sessions, or clean up the test-commit.md now?

Answer to "was there a trailer": No — the commit only carries the Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 line. No entire-specific trailer.

And here's the important part: I checked the last 30 commits in this repo and none of them use an entire commit trailer either (just normal stuff like Signed-off-by). So entire doesn't surface work in the web dashboard via commit trailers — which means the missing trailer isn't actually the problem.

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• entire links work to its dashboard through session checkpoints on shadow branches (you saw these in the doctor output: entire/checkpoints/v1, entire/c0d4ba4-930eb9), not through commit-message trailers. The web dashboard renders sessions → checkpoints, not raw git commits on your working branch.
• In manual-commit mode, a plain git commit I run does not create an entire checkpoint — checkpoints are session-scoped artifacts that the agent integration emits.
• The real reason it's invisible: this Claude Code session isn't registered with entire. Look back at entire status — the Active Sessions list shows old Codex/Claude sessions, but not the session I'm running right now. No tracked session → no checkpoint → nothing in the dashboard, regardless of the git push succeeding. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

So the chain is: git push ✅ (verified on remote) → but no entire session/checkpoint for this session → nothing in the web dashboard.

The likely cause is that this Claude Code session started against the outer entire repo (/Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire), and I only cd'd into the inner CLI worktree for Bash commands. entire's session tracking is tied to where the agent process was launched and its hooks — not to my cd. So entire is (if anything) tracking this session against the outer repo, not this worktree.

To actually see agent work in the dashboard for this worktree, the session needs to be launched from inside /Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire/devenv/entireio/cli/.worktrees/vscode-hooks so entire's hooks register it there.

Want me to:

1. Verify this theory — check whether this session ID (749d94ff...? or another) is tracked, and against which repo, and
2. confirm whether the outer-repo entire shows anything?

Or if you'd rather just get a visible result fast: start a fresh Claude Code (or Codex) session from inside this worktree directory and make the commit there — that one will check-point and appear in the dashboard.

That's the definitive answer. Here's the gate, straight from manual_commit_hooks.go:405-415:

And a second gate right after at :430: even if sessions exist, if none has new content to condense, "No new content — no trailer needed."

So, to answer your question directly

The premise has a subtle hole. The trailer isn't gated on entire tracking a session in the repo — it's gated on an active session for this exact worktree, with new checkpoint content. The hook checks findSessionsForWorktree(worktreePath), not "is entire enabled in this repo."

My commit got no Entire-Checkpoint trailer because neither condition was met:

1. No active session bound to this worktree. The Claude Code session running this conversation was launched against the outer repo (/Users/peytonmontei/Documents/entire). I only cd'd into .worktrees/vscode-hooks for Bash commands — but a cd doesn't register a session with entire. Session registration happens at agent-launch via the session_start hook, keyed to where the agent process started. So findSessionsForWorktree for this worktree returned zero → silent skip.

2. Even if a session existed, there was no agent checkpoint content tied to it for my hand-typed git commit. The trailer links a commit to condensed session work; a bare commit from the Bash tool produces none.

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• The trailer's presence is diagnostic: it appears only when a commit is genuinely the product of a tracked agent session in that worktree. Its absence on my commit is positive proof that entire was not tracking a live session here — exactly the conclusion you were probing toward.
• This is also why hand-typed commits and agent commits coexist cleanly: the hook is deliberately a no-op (return nil) when there's nothing to link, and the shell wrapper's 2>/dev/null || true guarantees a hook failure can never block your commit. The cost of that resilience is that a misconfigured or untracked session fails silently — you get no trailer and no warning, which is precisely the confusing situation you just hit. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

Bottom line: the missing trailer isn't a bug and isn't a sign the push failed — it's the expected result of committing from a worktree that has no active entire-tracked agent session. To get a trailer (and dashboard visibility), the commit must come from an agent session that was launched inside .worktrees/vscode-hooks, after it's produced checkpoint content.

Want me to verify this empirically — check whether any session in .git/entire-sessions/ is bound to this worktree's path? That would confirm 100% that zero sessions matched at commit time.

Now I have the truth, empirically. Here's the honest correction.

I was wrong — entire is tracking this worktree correctly

Everything I said earlier ("not tracking," "wrong worktree," "session anchored to outer repo") was incorrect theorizing. The evidence:

• There's an active Claude Code session bound to this exact worktree (adbd47bd, 6 checkpoints, worktree_path: .../.worktrees/vscode-hooks).
• entire is actively saving checkpoints here — the log shows checkpoint saved / committed changes to shadow branch at 11:18 and 11:20.
• When I ran the real prepare-commit-msg hook against the current state, it added the trailer: Entire-Checkpoint: cdb2ab1acb8b, and logged agent commit trailer added. The mechanism works perfectly.

So why did your 11:18 commit miss the trailer?

A state/timing condition at that one instant — not a tracking failure. The hook only stamps a trailer when, at commit time, a worktree session has new, un-condensed checkpoint content to link (the filterSessionsWithNewContent gate). At 11:18, that condition wasn't satisfied for my hand-typed git commit; by 11:25 (after this conversation's turns produced fresh checkpoints), it is — which is exactly why the probe just succeeded.

★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────

• The reason this was so hard to see: skip decisions log at DEBUG, but log_level is unset (→ INFO). So a "no content to link → no trailer" outcome leaves zero trace in the log. That silent-skip is by design (hooks must never block a commit), but it makes a missing trailer genuinely indistinguishable from a bug without flipping on DEBUG — which is what finally settled it.
• The scripts/entire-dev launcher go builds the CLI from source on every hook call. At 11:18 that cache was likely cold; regardless, the deciding factor was content-to-link state, not the build. ─────────────────────────────────────────────────

To get the visible result you actually wanted

The clean path: make a commit now while there's linkable content — it will carry the trailer, and the pre-push hook will sync it to the checkpoints remote for the dashboard. Want me to:

1. Re-do the test commit now (amend test-commit.md's commit or add a new one) so it gets a real Entire-Checkpoint trailer, then push — giving you the dashboard visibility, or
2. Turn on DEBUG logging (log_level: DEBUG in .entire/settings.local.json, gitignored) so every future commit's trailer decision is traceable and this never confuses us again?

I'd recommend doing both. Your call.