Collapse Checkpoint Metadata to v1

Using brainstorming because you explicitly asked for it, and using-superpowers because this is the start of the session. I’ll first gather the issue/PR context and local v1.1 code paths, then I’ll ask one focused clarification before proposing removal approaches.

I’m going to pull the GitHub discussion through gh so I can see issue and PR comments, not just the headline. In parallel I’ll locate local references to the v1.1 checkpoint machinery so the plan is anchored in actual code.

The issue is accessible through the API and has three comments. gh pr view can’t infer the repo from this worktree’s remotes, so I’m switching to explicit GitHub API endpoints for PR #1451.

The PR is Phase 0 from the issue: it adds checkpoint.Open/Stores and migrates construction sites, but leaves v1.1 mirroring behavior intact. I’m narrowing the local scan now to the actual checkpoint settings/ref/mirror paths instead of broad matches like generated API mirror code.

Locally, the v1.1 machinery clusters around CommittedRefs, the checkpoints_version setting, mirror repair/diagnosis, post-write mirror calls, push/fetch handling, and tests that assert reads target refs/entire/checkpoints/v1.1. I’m reading those code paths in slices now.

One important shape is already clear: v1.1 is not a separate backend in the current code. It is encoded as a ref topology where writes still go to entire/checkpoints/v1, reads point at refs/entire/checkpoints/v1.1, and multiple write/fetch/push paths keep that mirror aligned.

The mirror advancement is attached to more than condensation: attach, summary generation, combined attribution, stop/finalize updates, origin/checkpoint-remote fetches, and pre-push all know about the mirror. That makes a removal plan safer if it first collapses the topology back to a single v1 ref, then deletes now-dead helpers/tests in a separate checkpoint.

PR #1451 has one commit, no issue comments, no review-line comments, and one bot review summary. I’m checking the commit metadata and whether the branch has already landed locally before I propose sequencing.

I have enough context for the first brainstorming gate. No visual companion is useful here; this is a code/refactor sequencing problem, not a visual design problem.

One key sequencing question before I propose approaches:

Should the removal plan assume PR #1451 lands first and build on its checkpoint.Open / checkpoint.Stores facade, or should it be implementable directly on this current branch before #1451 is merged?

My current read: the cleanest plan is “after #1451”, because it gives us one construction seam and avoids editing the same scattered NewGitStore(... ResolveCommittedRefs(...)) sites twice.

That matches the shape I’m seeing: basing this on #1451 lets the v1.1 removal touch the centralized topology and facade instead of every old construction site. I’m moving to options now, with the compatibility risk called out because it’s the main decision.

Good. I’d base the removal on #1451.

Approaches

Recommended: collapse v1.1 behind the Phase 0 seam, then delete dead mirror code.
After #1451 lands, make checkpoint.Open / ResolveCommittedRefs always resolve the existing v1 topology: primary/read/push all entire/checkpoints/v1, no mirror. Then remove the v1.1-only helpers, doctor checks, push/fetch mirror refreshes, setting parser, docs, and tests. This is the smallest path that reduces overhead without fighting the future store abstraction.

Alternative: keep compatibility fallback for old v1.1 refs.
Reads would prefer v1, but maybe fall back to refs/entire/checkpoints/v1.1 if v1 is missing. This protects anyone who somehow has custom-ref-only metadata, but it keeps the concept alive in read paths and makes the new abstraction inherit legacy behavior we already decided not to promote.

Alternative: remove only active writes/pushes now, leave read/doctor support.
This cuts some push/write overhead while retaining support tooling, but it leaves most of the conceptual load and probably delays the real simplification.

My recommendation is the first approach, with one caveat: we should consciously decide not to preserve custom-ref-only v1.1 metadata. The current machinery writes v1 as source of truth, so v1.1 should generally be reconstructible or redundant. Keeping fallback support would make the removal less clean.

Does that compatibility stance look right: after removal, checkpoints_version: "1.1" is ignored and committed reads use entire/checkpoints/v1 only?

I’ll lock in the compatibility stance as: checkpoints_version: "1.1" becomes inert, and committed reads use entire/checkpoints/v1 only. Now I’m going to present the design in a few focused sections so we can catch scope problems before this turns into an implementation plan.

Design: Scope And Compatibility

Remove the v1.1 committed-read mirror as an active product/runtime concept. After this change, all committed checkpoint reads and writes use entire/checkpoints/v1. The setting value strategy_options.checkpoints_version: "1.1" is accepted but ignored, so existing config files do not break startup or hooks.

The removal should not introduce migration, fallback reads, or repair of refs/entire/checkpoints/v1.1. The old custom ref may remain in user repos as inert git data, but Entire stops reading, writing, diagnosing, refreshing, and pushing it.

This intentionally removes support for custom-ref-only metadata. Based on the shipped topology, v1 stayed the source of truth, so preserving custom-ref-only cases would keep the same confusing second read path alive.

Does this first section look right?

I don’t see a strong reason to keep strategy_options.checkpoints_version.

The only plausible reasons would be a deprecation window or protecting unknown internal configs, but neither seems compelling here:

• It was not public or announced.
• Existing settings files with "checkpoints_version": "1.1" should still parse because StrategyOptions is a loose map.
• Removing the helper/parser makes the future checkpoints.{primary,mirrors,git} shape cleaner and avoids two checkpoint-selection concepts.
• Keeping it as an ignored setting would create misleading dead config.

So I’d revise the design: remove the checkpoints_version behavior and the MirrorsToV1CustomRef parser entirely. Existing config keys become inert unknown data, not an error.

Does that revised scope look right before I continue with the architecture section?

Understood. I’m revising the scope to remove the checkpoints_version setting accessor and tests, while still leaving loose unknown settings alone so existing files don’t fail to load. Next section is the actual architecture cleanup.

Design: Architecture Cleanup

Build this on top of #1451.

1. Collapse committed refs to v1-only. checkpoint.CommittedRefs can shrink to the fields that still serve the abstraction work. In the smallest version, Primary, Read, and Push may remain for now because the future store facade and push/fetch paths still use them, but they all resolve to entire/checkpoints/v1. Mirror, HasMirror, and v1.1-specific resolution go away.

2. Remove v1.1 mirror operations. Delete strategy/v1_custom_ref_mirror.go and its test file, or split out any generally useful “advance primary ref” helper first if callers still need it. Post-write call sites stop invoking mirror refresh after committed writes.

3. Simplify sync paths. PrePush pushes only entire/checkpoints/v1. Fetch/rebase/metadata reconciliation no longer mirrors fetched v1 metadata to a custom read ref. Any pre-push “refresh mirror before push” work disappears.

4. Remove doctor/bundle mirror diagnosis. entire doctor should keep the metadata branch disconnected-history check, but drop the “checkpoint read mirror” check and repair flow. Doctor bundle should stop reporting v1.1 mirror status.

5. Remove settings parser and docs. Delete settings.MirrorsToV1CustomRef, EntireSettings.MirrorsToV1CustomRef, and related tests. Remove v1.1 sections from architecture docs and release notes for unreleased/current work where appropriate.

6. Prune tests. Delete tests whose only assertion is v1.1 custom-ref behavior. Convert only the useful ones that still cover v1 behavior, such as ensuring read paths use the configured store seam or push still sends v1.

The point is to remove the second-read-ref concept completely while preserving the useful Phase 0 seam for #1433.

Does this architecture section look right?

I’m treating that as approval for the architecture section. I’ll cover behavior, tests, and sequencing next, then turn the approved design into a spec document as the brainstorming workflow requires.

Design: Behavior, Tests, And Sequencing

Behavior

After removal:

• entire/checkpoints/v1 is the only committed checkpoint ref.
• refs/entire/checkpoints/v1.1 is ignored everywhere.
• strategy_options.checkpoints_version has no behavior and no parser.
• Hooks do less work after writes because they no longer mirror metadata.
• Pre-push pushes one checkpoint ref instead of v1 plus v1.1.
• Doctor no longer checks or repairs the v1.1 read mirror.

No migration is needed. Existing repos keep any stale refs/entire/checkpoints/v1.1 ref until users delete it manually or normal git cleanup removes it.

Tests

Focused coverage should prove the remaining behavior, not the removed feature:

• checkpoint refs resolve to v1-only.
• committed reads still bootstrap from origin when v1 is missing locally and available remotely.
• pre-push still pushes entire/checkpoints/v1.
• attach, explain summary generation, condensation, finalization, combined attribution, fetch/rebase, and metadata reconciliation still update/read v1 correctly.
• doctor still reports metadata branch health without mirror output.

Delete v1.1-only tests instead of rewriting them into inert-setting tests, unless a test naturally protects “unknown settings do not break load.”

Sequencing

I’d do this in step-by-step mode because it touches settings, checkpoint topology, strategy hooks, push/fetch behavior, doctor output, docs, and many tests.

Proposed commit shape:

1. checkpoint: collapse committed refs to v1 Remove v1.1 ref resolution and checkpoints_version parsing.

2. strategy: remove checkpoint mirror maintenance Delete mirror helpers and remove post-write/fetch/push mirror refresh calls.

3. doctor: remove checkpoint read mirror checks Drop doctor and bundle v1.1 diagnosis/repair output.

4. docs: remove checkpoints v1.1 rollout notes Update architecture docs and current release notes.

5. tests: prune v1.1 mirror coverage Delete or rewrite tests to match v1-only behavior.

In implementation planning, I’d consider merging tests with the behavior commits instead of leaving a final “tests only” commit, but as a review shape this is the right breakdown.

Does this final design section look right?

The design is approved. I’m going to write it into a local spec now, then self-review it for scope/ambiguity. I won’t commit it unless you explicitly approve that step.

The repo doesn’t have docs/superpowers/specs yet, so I’m creating that folder and adding a single design file there.

The spec is written. I’m doing the required self-review pass now: placeholders, contradictions, scope drift, and ambiguous requirements.

The self-review found no placeholders or obvious contradictions. I’m tightening one sequencing sentence so the implementation plan has an explicit decision point instead of soft wording.

The self-review scan is clean. One thing to note: git status --short is not showing the spec, which means this path is likely ignored or outside the tracked set; I’m checking that before I hand it back.

Spec written and self-reviewed at 2026-06-17-remove-checkpoints-v1-1-design.md.

Note: docs/superpowers is ignored by .gitignore, and I did not commit because you have not explicitly approved a commit. Please review the spec and let me know if you want changes before we move into implementation planning.

Using writing-plans now because the design has been approved and the brainstorming workflow’s next step is an implementation plan.

I’m drafting the implementation plan as an ignored local plan file under docs/superpowers/plans. Because the plan targets the post-#1451 code shape, I’ll include that as an explicit prerequisite and keep the tasks phrased around the checkpoint.Open facade.

I’ve got the task breakdown. The plan will keep the behavior and directly related tests together at each checkpoint instead of a final tests-only cleanup, which is less risky for a broad deletion.

I’m writing the plan now. It targets the post-#1451 tree and starts with a guard step that stops immediately if the checkpoint.Open facade is not present.

The plan is saved. I’m running the plan self-review now: coverage against the spec, placeholder scan, and consistency of names/signatures.

The plan self-review passed the placeholder scan, and both spec and plan are under docs/superpowers, which this repo ignores. I’m checking the final working-tree status so I can report accurately.

Plan complete and saved to 2026-06-17-remove-checkpoints-v1-1.md.

Both the spec and plan are under docs/superpowers, which is ignored by this repo, so git status remains clean.

Two execution options:

1. Subagent-Driven (recommended) - fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, faster iteration.
2. Inline Execution - execute tasks in this session using the plan, with checkpoints.

Which approach?

Using executing-plans for inline execution. I’m also loading the local TDD/testing guidance before editing because this plan changes Go behavior and tests together.

I’m using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan inline. Subagent-driven execution would give cleaner isolated task reviews, but you chose inline, so I’ll proceed step by step and stop at each checkpoint for review/commit approval.

First I’m running the plan’s base checks. If this worktree is not actually on top of #1451 yet, I’ll stop before editing because the plan depends on the checkpoint.Open facade.

Blocked at the plan’s first gate: this worktree is not based on #1451 yet.

Evidence:

The plan depends on #1451’s checkpoint.Open / Stores facade, so I stopped before editing.

Do you want me to bring #1451 into this worktree first? My recommendation is to merge/cherry-pick the PR commit onto this branch, then continue Task 1.

I’ll fetch PR #1451 and merge its head into this clean worktree, then re-run the base check. If the sandbox blocks git metadata writes, I’ll request the required escalation directly.

The PR head is fetched into FETCH_HEAD. I’m merging it now so your branch keeps its current commits plus the #1451 facade changes.

The sandbox blocked writing git worktree metadata (ORIG_HEAD.lock). I’m rerunning the same merge with approval, which is required to update .git/worktrees/....

PR #1451 is merged into this worktree. I’m re-running the base check and then I’ll continue with Task 1 unless something unexpected shows up.

The facade is present and the worktree is clean after the merge. I’m starting Task 1: collapse committed refs to v1-only and remove the checkpoints_version parser, with the focused tests first.

I’m reading the exact test/settings sections before patching so the first edit is tight and doesn’t disturb unrelated settings behavior.

I’m making the red test edit only: checkpoints_version: "1.1" should now be ignored by committed ref resolution, and the custom-ref topology cases are removed from these focused tests.

The red test edit is in place. I’m running the focused checkpoint test now and expect the new ignored-setting cases to fail against current production code.

The focused test failed for exactly the intended reason: "1.1" still switches reads to the custom ref. I’m applying the minimal production change now: v1-only committed refs plus removal of the settings parser/tests.

The remaining parser references are exactly in settings and checkpoint plus v1.1 tests scheduled for later cleanup. I’m editing only the Task 1 production files now.

Committed ref resolution is now v1-only. I’m removing the checkpoints_version parser functions and their dedicated tests next.

The parser code is gone; now I’m deleting only its tests, leaving the neighboring filtered-fetches settings tests intact.

I’m checking whether MetadataRefName and the removed Mirror field are still used outside this first task. If they are only in later cleanup areas, I’ll leave them for the appropriate task rather than widening this checkpoint.

The search shows MetadataRefName is still used by later tasks, so I’m leaving that constant for now. One checkpoint-package test file still asserts v1.1 read behavior, which would block the Task 1 package test; I’m reading it to remove only those now-obsolete cases.

I found a checkpoint-package test file whose v1.1 cases would no longer compile once CommittedRefs.Mirror is removed. I’m deleting those obsolete cases now and keeping the tests that still prove custom Primary/Read refs work as construction options.

The obsolete v1.1 read tests own their helper functions, so I’m removing that local helper block together with the tests rather than leaving dead code.

I’m checking helper definitions to avoid deleting one that another test still uses.

I’m preserving the useful “store respects explicit refs” test by switching it to a synthetic read ref, and changing the settings-based test to assert "1.1" is ignored. The custom-ref-only read tests are being removed.

I’m also updating the now-stale GitStore comment so it no longer documents a removed mirror field.

The Task 1 production/test edits are in. I’m formatting the touched Go files, then running the focused package tests from the plan.

Formatting completed without output. I’m running the checkpoint and settings tests now.

The settings tests passed. The checkpoint test compile failed because I removed imports that are still used by the v1 primary write test in the same file; I’m restoring those imports and rerunning the checkpoint test.

I restored the imports needed by the existing v1 write test and am formatting/rerunning the failed focused checkpoint command.

The planned checkpoint command now passes. Since I also touched nearby GitStore construction tests to remove v1.1 cases, I’m running those specific tests too before the checkpoint review.

The extra checkpoint tests passed and the parser/mirror symbols are gone from the checkpoint/settings packages. I’m reviewing the Task 1 diff now before I stop for your checkpoint review.

Checkpoint ready for Task 1.

I merged PR #1451 into this worktree first: a89b9881b1 Merge commit 'refs/pull/1451/head'....

Task 1 changes:

• CommittedRefs is now v1-only: removed Mirror, HasMirror, and v1.1 resolution.
• checkpoints_version parser helpers and tests are removed.
• Checkpoint tests now assert "1.1" is ignored.
• Removed checkpoint-package v1.1 read cases that depended on the retired custom ref.

Verification:

Changed files are: cmd/entire/cli/checkpoint/committed_refs.go, committed_refs_test.go, committed_read_store_test.go, store.go, cmd/entire/cli/settings/settings.go, and settings_test.go.

Review this checkpoint. If it looks good, say commit and continue; I’ll commit this batch and start Task 2.

I’ll commit the Task 1 checkpoint, then move into Task 2. The focused tests from the checkpoint are still valid because no files changed after they ran.

Using systematic-debugging for the compile failure before changing code. I won’t commit until the compile errors are fixed and verified.

I’m reproducing the compile failure directly now across the packages touched by Task 1 and the next affected callers. That will show whether the errors are only stale v1.1 references or whether Task 1 removed an API too early.

Root cause is clear: Task 1 removed CommittedRefs.Mirror and HasMirror before the downstream mirror-maintenance callers were removed in Task 2/3. That makes the checkpoint/settings packages pass, but the wider CLI no longer compiles. The smallest safe fix is to keep those members as transitional no-op topology until the mirror callers are removed next.

I restored the transitional Mirror field and HasMirror method, but DefaultV1Refs and both resolvers still leave Mirror empty. I’m formatting and rerunning the compile/test command that failed.

The compile errors are fixed: the same broad command now builds all four packages and fails only in v1.1 behavior tests that are scheduled for removal in later tasks. I’m running a compile-only check (-run '^$') to verify that distinction cleanly before doing anything else.

Compile-only verification passes now. I’m rerunning the Task 1 focused tests after the transitional Mirror restoration to make sure the checkpoint is still valid.

The compile errors are fixed and the Task 1 focused tests still pass. The wider package test run now fails only on v1.1 behavior tests that are explicitly scheduled for later deletion, not on compilation. I’m committing the approved Task 1 checkpoint now.

Using systematic-debugging for the compile break: I’m going to re-check the current tree, confirm the exact compile surface is clean, then only commit the approved checkpoint if the diff still matches the intended Task 1 scope.

The earlier root cause was a shared type edit that made later mirror-removal call sites fail to compile. I’ll verify the restored transitional shape is still present and that no extra files wandered into this checkpoint.

The diff is still the intended six-file Task 1 slice. Next I’m running a compile-only package check, which catches the earlier undefined-field/method errors without executing the v1.1 behavior tests that are deliberately still red until the next cleanup steps.

The compile-only check is clean across the affected packages. I’m doing the commit-time diff review and rerunning the focused tests for the actual Task 1 behavior before staging.

The focused tests for the changed checkpoint/settings behavior are green, and the compile-only check is green. I’m applying the verification-before-completion checklist before the commit so the checkpoint has command evidence attached to it.

The last focused runs were cached, so I’m rerunning them with -count=1 before committing. That gives fresh compiler/test output for this exact tree.

Fresh verification is clean for compile-only and the focused checkpoint/settings tests. I’m doing a final whitespace/status check, then I’ll make the approved Task 1 commit.

Committed Task 1 as d76654a630 after fixing the compile break. I’m moving into the next approved checkpoint now: removing the strategy-side mirror maintenance while keeping the diff compileable at the step boundary.

The working tree is clean after the Task 1 commit. I’m re-reading the Task 2 slice of the approved plan now and checking it against the compileability issue we just hit, because this step touches strategy call sites that still reference the transitional mirror fields.

One plan adjustment: Task 2 needs to leave the repo compiling at its checkpoint, so I’ll remove strategy mirror maintenance and update/delete the directly affected strategy/attach/explain tests in the same batch. Doctor/bundle diagnostics remain for Task 3 unless they become compile blockers.

The pre-edit focused run fails only in the old v1.1 mirror expectations and one ref-advance path whose helper currently still goes through mirror-era code. I’m locating the exact call sites now and will remove the mirror maintenance instead of patching those tests piecemeal.

I found the main production path: the mirror file owns both the old mirror APIs and the AdvanceLocalRef helper used by fetch/reconcile code. I’m splitting out only the ref-advance helper, then deleting the mirror APIs and their maintenance calls.

Besides the deleted mirror test file, a few older tests assert custom-ref side effects inside broader v1 flows. I’m reading those ranges and will preserve the v1 assertions while removing only the retired mirror expectations.

The broader tests are exactly what the red run suggested: v1 remains covered, while mirror-only assertions fail because checkpoints_version is now ignored. I’m going to remove those mirror assertions and keep the local v1/ref preservation checks intact.

There’s one dependency worth calling out before editing further: doctor/bundle still compile against the mirror diagnosis types from the same file that owns mirror maintenance. To keep this checkpoint reviewable, I’ll either retain the read-only diagnosis shim briefly or fold doctor removal into this checkpoint if the shim becomes noisier than deleting it.

Given those dependencies, the smaller coherent checkpoint is to fold Task 3 into this working-tree batch: delete the mirror maintenance and delete the doctor/bundle mirror checks that are its only remaining production consumers. I’ll stop for review before any commit and propose the revised commit shape there.

I’m reading the doctor ranges now, then I’ll patch the production code in one pass. The goal is still deletion-first: no new mirror substitute, just the v1 ref-advance helper that fetch/reconcile already need.

The doctor cleanup is straightforward: remove the mirror section from the help text, the check/fix function, and the bundle status line. The branch-disconnection repair stays untouched.

I’m also checking the doctor tests before patching so deleted helpers don’t leave dangling setup code. After this patch I’ll run compile-only first, then tighten test updates from actual compiler output.

Most of the doctor mirror helpers are now dead once the mirror tests go away. I’ll remove the whole block rather than leave helper residue.

The integration v1.1 tests are pure duplicate coverage once the config option is ignored. I’ll delete those tests rather than turn them into second copies of the existing v1 pre-push/attach checks.

I’m applying the production deletion now. This patch removes the mirror file, keeps the primary-ref advance helper in its own small file, and strips mirror refresh calls from pre-push, fetch, condensation, attach, explain, and origin-fetch paths.

Production mirror maintenance is gone. I’m removing the doctor/bundle consumers now so the deleted strategy API does not leave compile errors.

The first doctor patch missed the exact help text wording, so I’m applying it in smaller chunks against the current file content.

The doctor flow and help text no longer call the mirror check. I’m removing the deleted check implementation and hash formatter next.

The doctor check implementation is removed; one helper remained below the prompt code, so I’m deleting that last mirror-specific helper too.

Now I’m removing the bundle mirror status helper and its imports. The bundle still records Entire refs via git for-each-ref.

I’m deleting the mirror-specific doctor tests and helpers now. The disconnected metadata branch tests remain in place.

The doctor mirror tests are gone. I’m adjusting the bundle test so it only asserts the v1 refs report remains present.

Next I’m updating the remaining tests that asserted the custom ref was created. Each one keeps the v1 behavior assertion or deletes duplicate v1.1-only coverage.

The EnsurePrimaryRef test now checks only the v1 seed. I’m removing the invalid rewind test that constructed metadata only on the retired custom ref.

That rewind test was only about reading from the custom ref, so it is being removed rather than rewritten. The surrounding multi-session prompt behavior stays untouched.

The fetch/rebase test already verifies the local v1 ref shape after repair. I’m removing only the custom-ref assertion from it.

The settings path in this test used a literal filename, so the first patch did not match. I’m applying the narrower edit against the actual lines.

Now I’m updating the checkpoint-remote test to keep the “local branch updates to remote tip” assertion and drop the mirror assertion.

That checkpoint-remote test also set the retired version flag just to observe the mirror. I’m removing both the setting fixture and mirror check.

The metadata reconciliation mirror test is a v1.1 side-effect test. I’m removing the mirror setup/assertion and keeping disconnected repair coverage in the existing reconciliation tests.

This reconciliation test has no remaining assertion once the mirror is gone, and the actual reconciliation cases are already covered above it. I’m deleting it outright.

I’m updating explain tests next: summary writes should still advance v1, but no longer attempt to mirror. The generation reload test becomes a v1 reload test.

The summary-generation test now checks the durable v1 branch update only. I’m removing the custom-ref fixture and assertion from it.

Now I’m converting the run-explain generation test from “v1.1 reload after mirror” into the remaining v1 behavior: generate a summary, reload it from v1, and verify v1 metadata was updated.

One leftover literal in that test still said v1.1; I’m cleaning that up so the test reads like the behavior it now covers.

I’m removing the attach tests whose only purpose was to assert the custom ref exists. The normal attach metadata write coverage remains.

There is also a non-integration attach test with the same mirror-only assertion. I’m deleting that one and its integration counterpart.

The unit attach mirror test duplicates the deleted behavior, so I’m removing the whole function.

I’m deleting the integration attach mirror test and its local rev-parse helper if it becomes unused.

The integration attach helper differs slightly from the expected patch text, so I’m reading the current tail and deleting it against the exact content.

The integration attach tail is mirror-only; I’m removing that exact block now.

The pre-push integration file already has a v1 branch push test immediately above the v1.1 test, so I’m deleting only the retired v1.1 pre-push test.

That integration test is pure v1.1 coverage and the v1 branch push is already covered by TestPrePush_PushesCheckpointBranchToOrigin, so I’m deleting it.

The production and directly affected tests are patched. I’m searching for remaining mirror APIs and custom-ref literals in the in-scope code before running gofmt.

Only the transitional Mirror field/method remains now. Since the downstream consumers are gone, I’m removing that from CommittedRefs in this checkpoint too.

The only matches outside checkpoint are unrelated repo-mirror concepts. I’m removing the committed-checkpoint mirror field now.

A scoped search now only finds two strategy tests and a couple of explanatory comments. I’m checking whether those tests are still meaningful or are also v1.1-only leftovers.

Two remaining tests were v1.1-specific: restore-logs reading from the custom ref, and orphan detection relying on that custom ref being unset. I’m deleting those because the setting no longer changes reads. The non-branch helper tests stay, with neutral example refs.

That restore-logs test depends on the helper from the deleted v1.1 mirror test file, so deleting it also removes a compile dependency.

The orphan-state test’s expected behavior was inverted by the config removal, so I’m deleting that v1.1-specific test rather than changing orphan semantics.

That clean test is mirror-topology-specific, so I’m deleting the whole function.

The remaining v1.1 text in strategy is only explanatory examples for generic non-branch ref tests. I’m swapping those to neutral custom-ref examples so they don’t imply the retired feature still exists.

I’m re-running the scoped mirror search before formatting. If anything remains in production or directly affected tests, I’ll handle it before compiling.

The scoped mirror search is empty. I’m formatting the changed Go files now, then I’ll compile the affected package set.

Formatting completed without changes reported. I’m running fresh compile-only checks for the CLI, strategy, checkpoint, and integration test package now.

The compile-only run now fails only on deleted-test fallout: unused imports and one unused local. I’m removing those mechanical leftovers and rerunning the same compile checks.

I’m applying the unused-import cleanup directly from the compiler output, plus removing the now-unused v1Ref local.

The compile leftovers are patched. I’m formatting those files and rerunning the same compile-only commands.

Compile is clean now. I’m running the focused behavior tests for the strategy/CLI paths touched by this combined checkpoint, then the integration attach/pre-push compile-and-run subset because those tests were edited.

The focused run found one remaining CLI test with a v1.1 mirror expectation in git_operations_test.go; strategy focused tests and integration attach/pre-push passed. I’m removing that leftover test now.

That test is entirely about mirroring after FetchMetadataBranch, so I’m deleting it.

I removed the last failing v1.1 fetch test. I’m formatting that file, rerunning the mirror search, then rerunning focused tests.

The scoped mirror search is empty again. I’m rerunning the focused CLI/strategy and integration subsets now.

The retry exposed one more unused import in git_operations_test.go from deleting the fetch mirror test. I’ll remove it and rerun.

Removing that unused import now.

I’ll format that import block and rerun the focused CLI/strategy tests.

The focused CLI/strategy tests and compile-only checks are clean. I’m running the broader affected package tests once to catch any remaining v1.1 expectations outside the regex.

The broader package run caught more v1.1-only expectations in resume and review-context tests. Checkpoint/settings/strategy packages passed; CLI still has retired custom-ref tests. I’m deleting or converting those now so the package test reflects v1-only behavior.

There are more custom-ref tests beyond the first planned slice: resume, review context, head checkpoint flags, and dispatch local mode. They’re all checking the same retired read path. I’m removing those v1.1-only tests/helpers so full CLI tests can pass.

Resume’s v1.1 tests all use the same two helpers; I’m deleting those helpers and the tests that depend on them. Existing resume tests still cover v1 metadata reads and transcript restore.

Resume v1.1 tests are removed. I’m doing the same for review-context’s custom-ref-only helper/test.

The review-context custom-ref test has dedicated helpers, so I’m removing the test and those helpers together.

Now I’m removing the head-checkpoint flag test that forced reads through the custom ref.

That head flag test is v1.1-only; I’m deleting it.

Dispatch local-mode has two tests and helpers around the custom ref. I’m removing the v1.1-only tests/helpers there too; the normal v1 local-mode behavior remains covered elsewhere in that file.

The dispatch custom-ref helpers are only used by those two tests, so I’m removing both tests and helper functions.

Only those tests/helpers reference the custom ref in dispatch local-mode. I’m deleting them now.

I’m removing the production comment that still mentions the v1.1 mirror opt-in in dispatch local-mode.

That dispatch comment now just needs to explain the repo-root settings scope, not mirror topology.

There is one resume production comment still referring to the local-only v1.1 mirror. I’m removing that example.

The remote-metadata comment can now just state the branch-tracking condition.

I’m checking whether the MetadataRefName constant is now unused. If so, I’ll delete it rather than leave a retired public constant around.

The only remaining MetadataRefName references are now the constant itself and checkpoint tests that deliberately verify checkpoints_version is ignored. I’m checking exact usage before deleting the constant.

MetadataRefName is unused, so I’m deleting the retired constant and its comment from paths.

The paths package now only needs the v1 branch name.

I’ve removed the remaining custom-ref tests and constant. I’m formatting all changed Go files and then rerunning the affected package test set.

Formatting completed. I’m running compile-only first because we deleted several helper blocks.

The compile fallout is only unused imports from the deleted tests. I’m removing those and rerunning compile-only.

I’m applying that import cleanup exactly from the compiler output.

The stale imports are removed. I’ll format those files and rerun compile-only.

Compile-only is clean across the affected packages. I’m rerunning the broader package tests that previously exposed the retired v1.1 expectations.

The broader affected package tests are now clean. I’m doing the checkpoint review commands: diff shape, whitespace check, and a scoped search for remaining code references so I can summarize exactly what changed before asking for commit approval.

Fixed the compile errors and carried the cleanup further so the affected package tests pass.

Current state:

• Task 1 was committed as d76654a630.
• Uncommitted checkpoint now removes the v1.1 mirror machinery and its consumers:
  • strategy mirror implementation/tests
  • mirror refresh calls after writes/fetch/pre-push
  • doctor/bundle mirror checks
  • v1.1-only resume/review/dispatch/attach/head-flag tests
  • unused paths.MetadataRefName
• Remaining checkpoints_version references are only in checkpoint tests that assert it is ignored.

Verification:

• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli/checkpoint ./cmd/entire/cli/settings ./cmd/entire/cli/strategy ./cmd/entire/cli ./cmd/entire/cli/dispatch exited 0.
• go test -count=1 -tags integration -run 'TestPrePush|TestAttach' ./cmd/entire/cli/integration_test exited 0.
• git diff --check exited 0.

I have not committed this checkpoint yet because the planned commit shape changed: keeping compile/test cleanliness required folding the doctor and remaining v1.1 test cleanup into this batch. Suggested commit subject: checkpoint: remove v1.1 mirror machinery.

I’m checking current references before answering so I don’t infer from the plan rather than the actual diff.

Those helpers survived because they were split out of the deleted mirror file, but the search shows they still sit on several v1 ref-advance paths. I’m checking whether they add behavior anymore or are now just wrappers.

You’re right to question it. The helpers only made sense when “advance primary” also had to trigger the best-effort v1.1 mirror; with that side effect gone, they are mostly semantic wrappers around SetReference. I’m going to remove them from this checkpoint rather than leave them for a hypothetical later cleanup.

The call sites can use the existing setRefHash helper inside strategy instead. That keeps one ref-update primitive instead of two wrapper names with no side effect.

The wrappers are deleted and their call sites now use setRefHash. I’m formatting and rerunning the relevant compile/test checks.

Formatting completed. I’m verifying the helper names are gone before rerunning the affected packages.

The wrappers are gone; the search output is only SafelyAdvanceLocalRef, which is a different reconciliation helper. The only compile fallout is an unused checkpoint import in push_common.go; I’m removing that now.

I’ll format the import block and rerun the affected tests.

Running fresh package tests now after removing the wrappers.

They no longer had a real point. They were originally the place where “advance v1” also meant “best-effort update the v1.1 mirror.” Once the mirror side effect was removed, they became thin wrappers over SetReference.

I removed them now rather than leaving them for later. Call sites now use the existing setRefHash helper directly, and cmd/entire/cli/strategy/committed_ref.go is deleted.

Verification after that change:

• rg -n '\bAdvanceCommittedPrimary\b|\bAdvanceLocalRef\(' cmd/entire/cli exits with no matches.
• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli/checkpoint ./cmd/entire/cli/settings ./cmd/entire/cli/strategy ./cmd/entire/cli ./cmd/entire/cli/dispatch exits 0.

Using the verification-before-completion checklist for the commit boundary: I’m going to re-check the working tree and whitespace, then commit the current checkpoint exactly as it stands before moving on.

The tree has a mix of staged and unstaged edits from the earlier checkpoint work, so I’m staging the whole in-scope cmd/entire/cli diff in one commit. The last affected-package test run is still valid for these files; git diff --check is clean.

Committed the mirror-removal checkpoint as 051354e665. I’m continuing with the remaining cleanup: docs and release-note references to the v1.1 mirror/config path.

The next batch is documentation/release-note cleanup. Current search finds active v1.1 docs in sessions-and-checkpoints.md, AGENTS.md, and current changelog entries; I’m reading those sections now and will update only the checkpoint-specific references.

AGENTS.md is a symlink to CLAUDE.md, so I’ll edit CLAUDE.md for the project-doc section. The historical changelog entries are already published release notes, so I’ll revise the current 0.7.6 entry and leave older history alone unless it presents current guidance.

I’m making the docs changes now: remove the active architecture section, drop the project-doc v1.1 bullet, and replace the current changelog rollout note with the removal note.

The active docs are updated. I’m running the planned search to see what checkpoint-specific references remain, separating historical changelog entries from current guidance.

The only remaining matches are the new removal note plus historical changelog entries from prior releases; architecture docs and project instructions no longer describe v1.1 as active. I’m doing a whitespace/status check for this docs checkpoint now.

Committed the code checkpoint as 051354e665 (checkpoint: remove v1.1 mirror machinery) and completed the next docs checkpoint.

Current uncommitted docs changes:

• Removed active v1.1 mirror documentation from docs/architecture/sessions-and-checkpoints.md.
• Removed the v1.1 project-doc bullet from CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md.
• Replaced the current changelog rollout note with a removal note.

Verification:

• git diff --check exited 0.
• Search still finds only the new removal note and historical changelog entries from prior releases; no active architecture/project-doc guidance remains.

I stopped here at the review checkpoint.

Using the executing-plans and verification-before-completion flow for this checkpoint: I’ll re-check the docs diff, commit it, then run the final reference sweep from the plan.

I’ll commit the docs cleanup checkpoint now, then continue with the final reference sweep so we don’t leave any active v1.1 machinery behind.

The docs checkpoint is committed as ac3388702b. I’m moving into the final sweep now: first I’m checking for active references, then I’ll run the focused verification that still covers the edited Go packages.

I’ll treat this as review feedback on the docs checkpoint: first I’ll inspect the exact published-changelog edit, then I’ll undo only that line and commit the correction.

Using receiving-code-review and verification-before-completion here. The requirement is narrow: restore CHANGELOG.md to the pre-docs-checkpoint contents, keep the architecture/CLAUDE cleanup, and amend or recommit that docs checkpoint because it has not been pushed.

The current HEAD commit is clean but includes the changelog edit. I’m going to surgically restore only that file’s original 0.7.6 entry and then amend the just-created docs commit so the branch history doesn’t carry a needless changelog-only correction.

I’ve verified the changelog delta: it removed a published 0.7.6 bullet and added a replacement bullet in the same published release. I’m restoring that exact diff now and leaving the non-changelog docs cleanup intact.

Before rewriting the local docs commit, I’m checking the net diff against its parent and whether any remote branch already contains the commit. That keeps the amend scoped and avoids rewriting something that left the machine.

The net amended docs commit now touches only CLAUDE.md and the architecture doc; CHANGELOG.md is just staged as a reversal of the prior mistake. No remote branch contains the current HEAD, so I’m amending the local commit.

The amend completed and the commit hash changed to b0f941d575. I’m doing a quick post-amend check now: clean tree plus no changelog diff in the amended commit.

I restored CHANGELOG.md to its pre-checkpoint contents and amended the unpushed docs commit.

New commit:

b0f941d575 docs: remove checkpoints v1.1 architecture notes

Post-amend checks:

• git status --short --branch shows a clean tree.
• git show --stat --oneline HEAD shows only CLAUDE.md and docs/architecture/sessions-and-checkpoints.md.
• git diff HEAD^ HEAD -- CHANGELOG.md has no output, so the changelog is no longer changed.

I’ll verify the current branch state before answering, because the previous sweep was interrupted after the search output and before I classified what remained.

Using verification-before-completion for this status check. I’m separating “active machinery” from expected residue, because broad v1.1 searches also hit historical release notes and the implementation plan we used.

The active-code search found no mirror-maintenance symbols. The remaining active-tree matches are two tests that intentionally assert checkpoints_version is ignored, plus an unrelated v1.10+ comment; I’m checking whether the plan/spec files showing up are branch changes or pre-existing docs.

The plan/spec files are not tracked and not in the branch diff, so they’re not release-facing work. I’m running the focused unit package set now, then the focused integration tests that cover attach/pre-push paths.

The focused unit package set exited 0. I’m running the focused integration tests next; these are the ones that previously had v1.1 mirror-specific coverage removed.

Both verification commands exited 0. I’m doing one last status check so the answer includes whether there are any uncommitted follow-ups.

There’s no uncommitted work. I’m going to run the required pre-push lint check as well, since that’s the only obvious gate left before sharing this branch remotely.

mise run lint exited 1 on one in-scope issue: an unused commitResumeTrailer helper left in resume_test.go after the v1.1 resume tests were deleted. I’m going to remove that dead test helper, run the focused checks again, and then commit the fix.

Root cause is confirmed: the helper has no remaining callers after the deleted resume mirror tests. I’m removing that helper and then checking imports plus lint.

I’m checking import usage before editing so the cleanup stays mechanical and doesn’t create a second lint failure.

The imports remain used elsewhere; only the helper body needs to go.

The stale helper is removed. I’m formatting the touched test file and then rerunning lint, because the failed lint command is the gate we’re trying to clear.

The diff is just the dead helper deletion. Running lint again now.

Lint now exits 0. Since the edit was in resume_test.go, I’m running the owning package test once before I hand this checkpoint back.

The package test exits 0. I’m checking the final diff/status now so I can answer exactly what is left.

I don’t see remaining implementation work in the v1.1 removal itself. The final sweep found no active mirror-maintenance symbols; the only active matches left are two tests that intentionally assert checkpoints_version is ignored, plus an unrelated v1.10+ comment. Historical CHANGELOG.md entries and the untracked plan/spec notes are left alone.

One lint issue did turn up: commitResumeTrailer in resume_test.go was unused after deleting the v1.1 resume tests. I removed that helper, so there is one uncommitted cleanup diff: cmd/entire/cli/resume_test.go | 16 deletions.

Fresh verification:

• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli/checkpoint ./cmd/entire/cli/settings ./cmd/entire/cli/strategy ./cmd/entire/cli ./cmd/entire/cli/dispatch exited 0.
• go test -count=1 -tags integration -run 'TestPrePush|TestAttach' ./cmd/entire/cli/integration_test exited 0.
• mise run lint initially failed on the unused helper; after removing it, mise run lint exited 0.
• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli exited 0.
• git diff --check exited 0.

Next action: approve committing the small cleanup, or tell me to squash it into an earlier commit.

I’ll commit the one-file cleanup first, then run pfleidi:review against the branch as requested. Before the commit I’m checking the exact diff one more time, then I’ll follow the review skill’s workflow.

Using pfleidi:review and verification-before-completion. The pre-commit diff is still the single stale helper deletion, and git diff --check exited 0, so I’m committing that cleanup now.

The cleanup commit is 0398c0cf06. I’m finishing the review-skill setup now: current diff against origin/main, branch context, and then I’ll launch the review agents in parallel.

Review context is collected: 53 changed files against origin/main, mostly Go changes removing v1.1 mirror machinery and tests, plus docs. I’m loading the available subagent tool and then starting the parallel review passes.

The review skill wants PR context when available, so I’m checking whether this branch already has a PR before launching agents.

gh pr view couldn’t resolve a GitHub remote in this worktree, so PR context is unavailable. I’m using the user goal, plan, commits, and diff surface as the review context.

The five first-pass agents are running. While they review independently, I’m doing a non-overlapping local sweep for residual v1.1 references and package diagnostics so I can verify or discard their findings quickly when they return.

The local residual-symbol sweep found no active mirror symbols. It did show one remaining production NewGitStore(repo, ResolveCommittedRefs(ctx)) in resume.go, so I’m reading that path now to decide whether it is intentional or a review finding.

resumeByCheckpointID still constructs a GitStore directly, but it preserves the same v1-only refs and blob fetcher behavior. I’m holding that as a possible cleanup/improvement rather than a correctness issue unless the agents find a concrete abstraction break.

Security finished with no findings. I’m waiting on the remaining correctness, simplification, readability, and Clean Go passes.

Clean Go returned one low-severity improvement: an unused Stores.Repository() method with stale mirror-repair wording. I’ll verify it against source after the remaining agents finish.

Simplification returned improvements around unused or over-broad facade surface. No Required findings yet; I’m still waiting on correctness and readability before synthesizing.

Readability added the same settings-facade concern and one additional improvement: resumeByCheckpointID bypasses checkpoint.Open. I’m waiting on correctness now, then I’ll run the second-pass coverage agent as the skill requires.

First-pass review is complete: no security or correctness findings, and the reported items are improvements. I’m launching the independent coverage sweep now without giving it the first-pass findings.

The coverage agent is running. I’m verifying the first-pass improvement candidates against source now, so the final report only includes items I can confirm.

I confirmed the first-pass improvement candidates in source. The settings override is indeed dead now, Stores.Repository() is unused and has stale wording, resumeByCheckpointID bypasses checkpoint.Open, and generateCheckpointSummary only needs the primary store.

Coverage found no additional findings. I’m closing the review agents and checking the working tree before I give you the synthesized report.

Committed the cleanup as 0398c0cf06 tests: remove stale resume helper.

pfleidi:review found no Required findings. Security, correctness, and the independent coverage sweep all reported no findings. Working tree is clean: git status --short --branch shows only ## feat/remove-checkpoints-v1.1-overhead.

Improvements

No review fixes were applied, because the skill only auto-fixes Required findings by default and all findings are Improvements.

I’ll fix the four review improvements together without committing. This is a small refactor batch: remove the dead settings path, route the remaining resume path through checkpoint.Open, delete the unused Stores.Repository, and narrow generateCheckpointSummary back to the committed store it actually uses.

Using receiving-code-review, pfleidi:clean-go, and verification-before-completion. The feedback is technically sound for this branch: every item removes dead or over-broad API surface introduced by the transition.

I’m applying the batch now. The only semantic path change is construction in resumeByCheckpointID; the rest removes unused/no-op surface or narrows a helper parameter without changing behavior.

The settings override is unused even outside checkpoint.Open; no caller sets attachOptions.entireSettings. I’m removing that no-op branch as part of the same batch so the API and comments match the v1-only behavior.

I removed the dead attachOptions settings hook as well; it existed only to call the now-deleted no-op resolver. Next I’m updating the direct call sites and tests.

resumeByCheckpointID now uses checkpoint.Open like the other resume paths, preserving the blob fetcher and refs behavior. I’m narrowing the summary helper next.

The summary helper now takes the committed store it uses instead of the whole facade. I’m updating the corresponding test helper call and then running the residual search.

The test opens Stores only to get the primary store, so the update is local to that call.

The residual search now only finds the intended summary helper call sites. I noticed committed_refs_test.go still has a stale comment about settings loading; I’m going to clean that while I’m in the same no-op settings path.

I also corrected the stale test comment so it now states the intended regression: on-disk checkpoints_version is ignored.

While editing open.go, I’m tightening the public comments to describe only the current API. That removes the remaining future-roadmap wording around the facade and avoids preserving v1.1-era “mirror” language in comments.

The code changes are in place. I’m formatting the edited Go files, then I’ll run focused tests and lint.

The batch diff now targets the four review items and the stale comments/tests around them. I’m running focused package tests plus the project lint task now.

Focused tests and lint both exited 0. gopls didn’t have package metadata for this worktree, so I’m relying on go test and lint for compile/static checks. I’m doing the final diff hygiene checks now.

Fixed the review improvements as one uncommitted batch.

Changes:

• Removed dead OpenOptions.Settings and ResolveCommittedRefsFromSettings.
• Removed unused Stores.Repository() and stale mirror/future-roadmap comments in open.go.
• Routed resumeByCheckpointID through checkpoint.Open.
• Narrowed generateCheckpointSummary to accept *checkpoint.GitStore.
• Cleaned related tests/comments around ignored checkpoints_version.

Verification:

• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli/checkpoint ./cmd/entire/cli exited 0.
• mise run lint exited 0, with golangci-lint reporting 0 issues.
• git diff --check exited 0.
• Residual search for the removed APIs/stale mirror wording returned no matches.

Current tree has 8 modified files, uncommitted.

I’ll commit the review-fix batch first, then continue by rerunning the review checks that are relevant to the issues we just fixed.

Using verification-before-completion for the commit gate. The current diff is exactly the eight-file review cleanup, and git diff --check exited 0, so I’m committing it now.

The batch is committed as 10436bdc99. I’m continuing with the post-commit checks: clean tree, residual-search for the fixed review items, and focused verification.

The tree is clean after the commit and the residual search returned no matches for the review leftovers. I’m rerunning the focused package tests and lint so the final status has fresh evidence after the commit.

Both post-commit validators exited 0. I’m doing one final status check now; if it’s clean, there’s no additional local follow-up from this checkpoint.

Committed the review-fix batch as:

10436bdc99 checkpoint: trim v1.1 removal leftovers

Continued with post-commit checks:

• Residual search for removed review leftovers returned no matches.
• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli/checkpoint ./cmd/entire/cli exited 0.
• mise run lint exited 0, with golangci-lint reporting 0 issues.
• git status --short --branch shows a clean tree.

No local follow-up is left from the review fixes.

Using pfleidi:pr. I’ll follow its flow directly: confirm branch scope against origin/main, sync with origin/main, discover/deduplicate verification, run it, then push and open a draft PR.

There is one new commit on the branch since my last status, e05c2d23ea Drop redundant temporary field from checkpoint Stores. I’m treating it as user/other-terminal work and including it in the PR scope review rather than rewriting it.

The branch scope is coherent: all 53 changed files are checkpoint v1.1 removal, the #1451 checkpoint-store seam, tests, or docs tied to that work. The tree is clean, so I’m fetching and merging origin/main next.

origin/main advanced, so I’m merging it into this branch before verification as the PR skill requires.

The merge from origin/main completed cleanly. I’m checking the post-merge state and then discovering the project’s documented verification commands rather than assuming the earlier focused checks are enough.

The branch is now merged with origin/main and clean. I found ./tmp; I’m checking whether it is ignored so I can use the PR skill’s verification cache rules, and I’m doing a hidden-file-aware discovery pass for mise and CI config.

tmp/ exists and is ignored, so I can use tmp/pfleidi-pr for the verification cache. There’s no .mise/ directory in this worktree, so I’m checking the repo task files and CI workflows directly.

mise.toml defines the local aggregate tasks and CI also runs mise run lint, test:ci:core, sharded integration, and e2e canary. I’m reading the task directory now because the lint/core tasks are implemented there rather than all inline in mise.toml.

The verification sources did not change on this branch, and the local tasks line up with CI. I’m checking for a PR verification cache under tmp/pfleidi-pr; if it’s absent, I’ll write a fresh one after selecting the command plan.

There is no existing cache. For local PR verification I’m selecting the documented build, lint, and CI-core test commands; I’m not running full sharded integration or e2e canary locally because CI covers those and the branch doesn’t change the e2e harness or prompt parsing.

I created tmp/pfleidi-pr/ for the ignored cache. I’m recording the selected command plan there, then I’ll run verification in dependency-safe batches.

Verification plan:

• Mutating formatter first: mise run fmt.
• Then read-only build/lint/core tests in one batch: mise run build, mise run lint, mise run test:ci:core.
• Integration spot check separately for changed attach/pre-push/resume paths.

I’m starting with the formatter.

mise run fmt exited 0. I’m checking whether it changed the tree before starting the read-only validators.

The formatter made no changes. I’m running the independent build, lint, and CI-core test commands now from the same clean tree.

Build and lint exited 0. The CI-core test command is still running, so I’m waiting for its final result before starting the integration spot check.

mise run test:ci:core is still running without new output. I’m continuing to wait; no files are being touched while that validator is active.

Build, lint, and CI-core tests all exited 0. I’m running the integration spot check for the changed attach/pre-push/resume surfaces now.

The integration spot check exited 0. I’m checking for uncommitted changes from verification; if the tree is clean, I’ll push the branch.

Verification left one uncommitted change in .opencode/package-lock.json. I’m inspecting it now; per the PR workflow I need to stop for your decision before pushing if the tree is dirty.

PR prep is blocked by an uncommitted, unrelated lockfile change:

.opencode/package-lock.json

It updates @opencode-ai/plugin from 1.4.7 to 1.17.7 plus dependency versions. That is outside the checkpoint v1.1 removal scope, so I did not push or create the PR.

Verification completed before the dirty-tree check:

Decision needed: should I discard the .opencode/package-lock.json change and continue with the PR, or do you want to keep/commit it separately?

I’ll discard only the unrelated .opencode/package-lock.json change, re-check the tree, then continue the PR flow from the push/create step.

The unrelated lockfile change is restored from HEAD. I’m checking the tree and branch metadata before pushing.

The working tree is clean again and the changed-file list is scoped to the checkpoint v1.1 removal work. I’m pushing the branch now.

The push is still running; Entire is syncing the checkpoint metadata ref as part of the push.

The branch is pushed and tracking origin/feat/remove-checkpoints-v1.1-overhead. I’m writing the draft PR body now, using entireio/cli from the entire://.../gh/entireio/cli origin URL.

The PR body is in ignored tmp/pfleidi-pr/pr-body.md. I’m creating a draft PR now.

Understood. I’ll check whether the interrupted gh pr create actually created anything, then create or retarget the draft PR with soph/pluggable-stores-phase0 as the base.

gh is currently unable to talk to GitHub: both PR lookups returned HTTP 401: Bad credentials. I’m checking auth status once so I can report the exact blocker and a usable compare URL if creation can’t proceed locally.

The problem is specifically an invalid GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable overriding gh auth. I’m trying gh with that variable unset for this command; if the keychain auth is valid, I can still create the PR.

Blocked on GitHub auth, not the branch state.

What I verified:

• Branch is pushed: origin/feat/remove-checkpoints-v1.1-overhead
• Desired base branch exists: origin/soph/pluggable-stores-phase0
• Working tree is clean
• gh fails because GITHUB_TOKEN is set but invalid: HTTP 401: Bad credentials
• Unsetting GITHUB_TOKEN leaves gh unauthenticated.

Use this base when creating the PR:

After gh auth is fixed, I can run that directly.

PR created: https://github.com/entireio/cli/pull/1454

Base is soph/pluggable-stores-phase0, which matches the dependency on #1451.

Using pfleidi:pr-feedback. I’ll fetch unresolved review threads for PR #1454, classify them, fix eligible items, verify, then publish replies/resolutions for addressed threads.

Using pfleidi:pr-feedback with receiving-code-review. The branch is clean and tracking the PR branch, so I’m fetching PR metadata and unresolved review threads next.

gh is blocked in this environment by the stale invalid GITHUB_TOKEN, so the authenticated GraphQL path cannot run here yet. I’m going to try the public GitHub REST API for read-only comment discovery; publishing replies/resolutions will still need a valid gh token in this environment.

I’ll retry the pfleidi:pr-feedback flow from the authenticated GitHub steps: PR metadata first, then unresolved review threads via GraphQL.

gh auth status still reports an invalid GITHUB_TOKEN, but gh pr view succeeded, so I can at least fetch PR metadata. I’m trying the required GraphQL review-thread query now.

I found 2 unresolved review threads, both from copilot-pull-request-reviewer, with no pagination remaining. Both are automated-reviewer comments, not bot/linter output.

Human / Automated Reviewer Comments

Bot Comments None.

I’m applying both small fixes now: a local summary updater interface for the first, and a comment clarification for the second.

The first thread is source-backed: generateCheckpointSummary only calls UpdateSummary. I’m changing the parameter to the smallest private interface that expresses that behavior, not back to the whole Stores facade.

The second thread is a comment-only fix in the bundle report: the command still intentionally includes refs/entire so bundles capture custom or legacy Entire refs.

Both eligible automated-reviewer comments are patched. I’m formatting the two changed Go files, then I’ll run the focused verification for cmd/entire/cli plus build and lint.

The diff is limited to the two review threads. I’m running verification now: build, lint, and the cmd/entire/cli package tests.

Lint failed on the new interface signature, not on the behavior: inamedparam requires named parameters in interface methods. I’m fixing that exact issue and rerunning the same verification batch.

Using systematic-debugging for the lint failure. Root cause is the anonymous parameters in the new interface method; the fix is to name them to match the local lint rule.

The lint fix is applied. I’m formatting and then rerunning build, lint, and the focused package test from the same tree.

The diff is still limited to the two PR feedback files. Re-running verification now.

Verification passed after the lint fix. I’m updating the local feedback ledger and checking the final working-tree state before asking for commit approval, as the skill requires.

Addressed both unresolved automated-reviewer threads locally. No bot comments were present.

Verification:

Working tree has uncommitted fixes in:

• cmd/entire/cli/explain.go
• cmd/entire/cli/doctor_bundle.go

Suggested commit message:

Approve committing these fixes and I’ll commit, push, reply to both review threads, and resolve them.

I’ll commit the two PR feedback fixes, push the branch, then reply to and resolve the two addressed review threads.

Committed as 7d667c32c2. I’m pushing it now.

Push completed. I’m preparing the review-thread reply plan and then I’ll post concise replies and resolve both addressed threads.

Reply plan:

Proceeding with those API calls now.

Both replies were posted and both threads resolved. I’m doing a final status/thread check so the summary reflects the current PR state.

PR feedback handled and published.

Pushed 7d667c32c2 to origin/feat/remove-checkpoints-v1.1-overhead.

Verification before commit/push:

• mise run build exited 0
• mise run lint exited 0, golangci-lint reported 0 issues
• go test -count=1 ./cmd/entire/cli exited 0
• git status --short --branch is clean and tracking origin

Ledger: tmp/pfleidi-pr-feedback/pr-feedback-1454.md